|
Ultrasound in the prediction of canine litter size and gestational age
|
Many private owners and breeders want to use this service: sonographic diagnosis of the litter size and the gestational age. This survey determines the accuracy of this technique and gives information about the optimal time of the examination. A very important study for every small animal practitioner!
|
|
|
| |
Different sonographic criteria have been developed to estimate canine fetal age, including fetal mensuration and assessment of fetal organ development.
This retrospective study assessed the accuracy of gestational age and litter size predictions in 76 bitches using one of two techniques.
The first method used the differential features of fetal organ development that occur in early and mid pregnancy, based on published tables for beagles.
The second method used biparietal head and trunk diameters to predict gestational age based on tables published for late gestational Labrador Retrievers.
The accuracy of the two methods was compared and the effect of maternal body weight and litter size evaluated.
Litter size and maternal body weight did not affect the accuracy of gestational age prediction.
Using a combination of both methods, the overall accuracy of predicting parturition date within 65 ± 1 day and ± 2 days was 70.8% and 86.1%, respectively.
The correct litter size was predicted in 65% of cases, and in 89.5% of cases for ± 1 pup. Pearson`s correlation between actual litter size and predicted litter size was high (R = 0.957, P < 0.001).
The organ development method of predicting gestational age was more accurate than late gestational fetal mensuration (P = 0.019). The optimum time for sonographic estimation of fetal age and litter size is early and mid pregnancy.
Source: ZM Lenard, BJ Hopper, NV Lester, JL Richardson, ID Robertson (2007): Accuracy of prediction of canine litter size and gestational age with ultrasound. In: Australian Veterinary Journal 85 (6), 222225.
Tell a friend
|
Print version
|
Send this article
|
| |
Reference intervals for blood parameters in Shetland Sheepdogs
Several breeds have physiological peculiarities that induce variations in reference intervals (RIs) compared with the general canine population. Shetland sheepdogs (SSs) are reported to be more predisposed to different diseases (eg, hyperlipidemia, gallbladder mucocele, and hypothyroidism). Consequently, a breed‐specific approach is more often required. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether the RIs of the general canine population could be applied to that of SSs, and to generate breed‐specific RIs, where appropriate.
|
|
Metastasis of a well differentiated perianal gland tumorPunica granatum associated with hepatotoxicosis in cattleToceranib phosphate (Palladia®) in canine gastrointestinal stromal tumorsRadioactive iodine uptake in hyperthyroid cats after rh-TSHHypoechoic tissue changes in dogs with malignant prostatic lymphomaEmphysematous gastritis in dogs and catsPrimary pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma in dogsDetermining prognosis in canine sepsis Correlation of plasma and tear glucose, creatinine and urea nitrogen in catsPerineal hernias in dogs - always a bilateral problem?Pharmacokinetic of gabapentin in catsFollicular development of canine ovaries stimulated by eCG plus hCG
|